“ We have a responsibility to stop insult and election encumbrance on our program . That ’s why we ’ve made significant investments since 2016 to better identify newfangled threat , close vulnerability and reduce the spread of viral misinformation and fake accounts , ” four elderly Facebook officialsbloggedon Monday , while announce several changes mean to “ help protect the democratic process . ”
At least two of Facebook ’s fact - look into partners , Politifact and Factcheck.org , have reviewed Trump ’s asseveration , feature in his new ad . Both fact - checkers clearly concluded that Trump ’s claim about Biden was false .
https://gizmodo.com/senator-wyden-warns-facebooks-targeted-ads-a-sophistica-1838885440
Facebook ’s fresh change will conveniently bid Zuckerberg and his surrogate something to point to when lawmaker unavoidably call them to take the stand ( again ) about Facebook ’s disproportionate influence over the election mental process and the flood of deliberately off-key entropy that its drug user consume every day . For instance , over the next calendar month , the company pronounce it think to begin rating subject matter fact - check by third party as “ false ” or “ partly assumed ” in an effort to help people “ settle for themselves what to record , trust and part . ”
Facebook also says it want to make it light for user to “ translate ” political ads , and will thus begin break how much Johnny Cash individual politician are spend . It will also take steps to battle voter suppression and intimidation , monitoring for false elector registration and voting information . to boot , it ’s offer to supervise the news report of elect officials and political candidates — with their consent — for “ potential hacking threats . ”
But what trade good are any of these measures when Facebook is at the same time accepting millions of dollar bill in ad buy to bomb its user with Trygve Halvden Lie ? If a nominee for office can pay Facebook to tell millions of Americansthat their opponent tried to bribe foreign leaderswhen there ’s zero evidence it ever happened , who leave a shit if Facebook hires a few more fact - checkers to warn user that some ridiculous claim might be “ partly false . ” Will its drug user even believe its warnings ? Of course not .
Facebook can seek to apologize its policies by repeating the phrase “ free speech ” as many times as it wants , on as many campuses that will give Mark a podium to shout it from . But in the ending , Facebook is n’t fighting misinformation ; it ’s getting paid billion upon million of dollars to spread it as far and as wide as it can , by at least one unscrupulous candidate who ’ll say virtually anything to win the airstream .
Far from defending elector from misinformation , Facebook is in the lying - to - voter line of work . And business is skilful .
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , science , and culture tidings in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
