A team of researchers have discovered a connexion between people who conceive inconspiracy theoriesand oppose hint farm , which may help excuse why such unswerving opposition arises when renewable wind turbines are instal . The results also show that changing peoples ' judgement is possible , but only when you do n’t frame it as a debate and or else assay to inform them in a non - confrontational fashion .
The researchers , from the University of Queensland , begin the study after being inspire by a like diving into conspiracy beliefs andvaccinationopposition , in the pursuit of understanding how such notion may stand up in the means of a last zero civilization .
nothingness farms have long been caught in the world of confederacy feeling , somehow turning a simple simple machine that spins in the current of air into a public health hazard that supposedly do innate parturition defects , cancer , and more . These have been pushed by anti - renewable lobbyists and subsequently politicians such as Donald Trump , despite zero evidence for such claims . Criticism also heavily focus on bird deaths by turbines , thoughrecent advanceshave attempted to check this trouble and even then , the deaths are dwarf by the universe go down via pollution and climate alteration .
The recap focused on eight pre - registered previous discipline with a collective sampling size of it of 4,170 citizenry . Each soul supply data regarding their age , sex , education , and political orientation , as well as their belief in various conspiracy theory .
They discovered a strong link between confederacy beliefs and lack of support for wind farm , indicating how likely each person was to vote for the installation of a farm in their local domain . Interestingly , certain conspiracies drove people even further by , these are often revolve about around the office ’ motives .
It also turn over into how to go about changing their minds , and the results found that pro - wind farm entropy shared in the area can have a positive upshot , while framing it as a public debate and information - dumping on mass does not help .
If governments are to combat this foe , the findings suggest that positive information needs to be share on a regular basis and be useable as a preventative meter , rather of attempting to debate and prove the conspiracy theorizer wrong .
you could find out more about how to talk to a conspiracy theorist inIssue 1 of CURIOUS , our eastward - magazine . Availablehere .
The study was put out inNature Energy .
